Up in Arms
While I support the rights of those who wish to own a firearm, I do not believe such a right extends to the point where public safety is at risk. So, I support bans on assault weapons; I believe in background checks and waiting periods. I do not support laws such as Virginia’s recent “Open Carry” law, or any other laws that allows folks to pack heat just because they are concerned about their safety. See, because them having guns makes me worry about my safety.
In any case, I’m entirely disappointed (though not surprised) that the Federal ban on assault weapons (what exactly does one hunt with an uzi? – lots of squirrels at one time?) expires midnight Monday.
What really pissed me off (if true), was the following tidbit from the San Fran Chronicle article Expired ban on assault weapons will leave us vulnerable:
With NRA support, Attorney General John Ashcroft (a longtime NRA member) has refused to allow law enforcement officials to check the federal list of firearm purchasers for suspected terrorists, purportedly because to do so would violate the privacy rights of gun owners.
Wait a second. You can search my library records, but the AG is unwilling “to allow law enforcement officials to check the federal list of firearm purchasers for suspected terrorists.” Ashcroft might just believe that the pen is mightier than the sword, but someone should slip him a memo that an Uzi with a 100 bullet clip sort of trumps both.
6 Responses to Up in Arms
Leave a Reply
Archives
- February 2016
- April 2014
- March 2014
- April 2013
- March 2012
- January 2012
- March 2011
- February 2011
- February 2009
- January 2008
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
Categories
So here’s a question: where does the ACLU stand on the privacy and firearms issue?
this is gratuitous, maybe tangential, but in case you mised it, here’s the link to a story that appeared in last week’s national review online:
http://www.nationalreview.com/kopel/kopel200409022215.asp
see, teachers should carry guns into the classroom. if the current administra… er… gun lobby gets its way, maybe first-grade teachers can bring that ak-47 to recess.
“If we are really serious about gun laws that protect “the children,†then it seems clear that — whatever other gun laws a society adopts — every civilized nation at risk of terrorist attack ought to ensure that armed teachers can protect innocent children.”
The right to bear arms: I’ve always been a big supporter of the right to arm bears instead.
I got it! We’ll put armed bears in the K-12 classroom.
Jason, Look at the stats–when concealed or open carry in a state is passed, crime rates DROP. If you are a law-abiding citizen, then there is absolutely no reason to be worried about your safety from someone packing heat. Most states require course work on handling a gun, shooting practice, and judicious use of deadly force. If you have a criminal record, guess what, no gun and no carry lic. Everyone that legally carries has NO criminal record and usually has practiced with thier weapon many hours. The only reason to fear us that carry is if you plan on doing something criminally wrong to us.
Shannon, when you point me to stats that say that crime rates drop due to concealed or open carry laws, I’ll be happy to review them. Overall, violent crime has decreased nationally, but I’m not willing to attribute that drop to open carry laws. In fact, crime had descreased before Virginia’s open carry law went into effect (begging the question of why it was necessary to begin with).
As I said many months ago, I respect others’ right to own weapons (with appropriate checks and balances), but the sort of behavior that many people (predominantly white males, as I recall from the articles) were engaging in politically, in which they would arrive with a weapon on their hip in politically sensitive discussions (the VA legislature sessions) or even in public (gathering in groups in Starbucks) simply to make a point, well, I find it threatening. You might assert that you are law-abiding and there’s nothing to fear, but that would be pretty easy to say if you were standing in a restaurant with a gun on your hip. If you don’t trust me or other citizens enough to walk around unarmed, why in the world should I trust you?